KimmiKitti Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Tell why or why not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimmiKitti Posted December 19, 2004 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 (edited) NO! Animals have rights. We are just like them in alot of ways. HELLO we think breath and eat etc like them, why should we treat animals this way???!?!?!!? Edited December 19, 2004 by KimmiKitti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Your voting options are very.. Odd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitzer71988 Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 I think it's kinda mean using animals as a "product tester" Why can't they use people to test that stuff on? I can't really think of a way to explain it, but it just seems rather mean to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mal Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 i do think its mean...cuz y would u use animals for that? and besides i like animals so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugargirl Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 Same goes for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidFox Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 Well in the case of haircare and perfumes, it's just stupid. It's a shame that animals siffer because humans are so vain. But I feel testing medicines on animals is a little different. Think of a scenario. A dog and a young man both have a disease without a cure (so far). A doctor thinks he's found something that may work, although there may be a risk that he's wrong and could kill whoever he tests it on. The young man has a bright future ahead of him if the cure works. The dog lays around all day, craps everywhere and really does nothing except be loved by humans. Which would you rather risk killing? It sounds brutal, but I'd much rather a dog was killed than a person with a good future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted January 5, 2005 Report Share Posted January 5, 2005 What if sparing the dog would result in his (or her) saving a childs life and that child would grow to accomplish more and be of more value (not just financially) to the world, having a brighter and more meaningful life than the owner of the dog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockoncheese101 Posted January 6, 2005 Report Share Posted January 6, 2005 Just cause animals cant say their pain by speach doesnt mean we should take advantage of em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurricane Posted January 7, 2005 Report Share Posted January 7, 2005 What if sparing the dog would result in his (or her) saving a childs life and that child would grow to accomplish more and be of more value (not just financially) to the world, having a brighter and more meaningful life than the owner of the dog? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, then you should kill the dog, buy a goldfish (they're fairly cheap), tether the child to the fish and not have to worry about anything. The child would learn how to swim in circles for days on end, the fish would have a nice companion, and the dog would be in dog heaven (or hell if he was a pit bull). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts